evidence_act_en_01

‘Self-regarding’ statements

can be self-harming statements

can be self-serving or self-harming

none of the above.

can be self-serving statements

A fact forming part of the same transaction is relevant under section 6 of Evidence Act

if it is in issue and have occurred at the same time & place

though not in issue and may have occurred at the same time & place or at different times& places

though not in issue, must have occurred at the same time & place.

if it is in issue and may have occurred at different times & places

Presumptions under the law of evidence are

(d) only (b) & not (a)

(a) presumption of facts

(b) presumptions of law

What is correct as regards the admissibility of self-regarding statements

self-serving and self-harming statements both are generally inadmissible

self-serving and self-harming statements both are generally admissible

self-harming statement is admissible but a self-serving statement is not generally admissible

self-serving statement is admissible but a self-harming statement is not generally admissible

Law of evidence is

lex loci solutionis

lex situs.

lex tallienis

lexfori

Relevancy is

question of law and can be raised at any time

question of law which can be waived

question of procedure which can be waived.

question of law but can be raised at the first opportunity

Bangladesh Evidence Act was drafted by

Huxley

Sir Henry Summer Maine.

Sir James F. Stephen

Lord Macaulay

Proof of a fact depends on

artificial probative value assigned to a fact

accuracy of the statement and not upon the probability of its existence

not upon the accuracy of the statement but upon the probability of its existence

rigid mathematical demonstration.

Facts can be

psychological facts

physical as well as psychological facts

physical facts

only physical facts & not psychological facts.

The facts which form part of the same transaction are relevant

under section 6 of Evidence Act

under section 5 of Evidence Act

under section 7 of Evidence Act

under section 8 of Evidence Act.

Question of mode of proof is

a question of procedure but has to be raised at the first opportunity and stands waived if not raised at the first opportunity

a question of procedure & can be raised at any time

a mixed question of law & fact.

a question of law which can be raised at any time

Motives, of preparation and conduct are relevant

under section 8 of Evidence Act

under section 7 of Evidence Act

under section 6 of Evidence Act

under section 9 of Evidence Act.

Under the law of evidence, as a general rule

opinion on a matter of fact is relevant but not on a matter of law

opinion on a matter of law is relevant but not on a matter of fact

opinion on a matter of fact and law both are relevant

opinion whether on a matter of fact or law, is irrelevant.

Law of evidence is

(a) a substantive law

(b) an adjective law

(d) neither (a) nor (b).

Several classes of facts, which are connected with the transaction(s) in a particular mode, are relevant

under section 9 of Evidence Act.

under section 6 of Evidence Act

under section 8 of Evidence Act

under section 7 of Evidence Act

Under the law of evidence, the relevant fact

must be legally & logically relevant

must be logically relevant

must be legally relevant

must be legally & logically relevant and admissible.

Which of the following documents are not admissible in evidence

(a) documents improperly procured

(b) documents procured by illegal means

(d) neither (a) nor (b).

Fact in issue means

fact, existence or non-existence of which is disputed by the parties

all the above.

fact existence or non-existence of which is not disputed by the parties

fact, existence or non-existence of which is admitted by the parties

Under section 8 of Evidence Act

all the above.

preparation is relevant

conduct is relevant

‘motive is relevant

The law of evidence consists of

rules of logic

ordinary rules of reasoning

all the above.

legal rules of evidence